Once upon a time, there was a client who took a taxi from Helsinki Airport. He was in a hurry to reach his destination and was expecting a smooth and straightforward ride. However, things took a turn for the worse when the driver took a long route, instead of the most direct one. The client, who was unfamiliar with the city, didn't realize what was happening until it was too late.The drive was excessively long, and the meter kept ticking up. The client became increasingly worried as the fare kept getting higher and higher. When they finally reached their destination, the client was shocked to see how much he was being charged. It was a much higher amount than he was expecting, and he felt like he had been taken advantage of. The client tried to explain the situation to the driver, but the driver didn't seem to understand or care. He simply handed the client the receipt and drove away. The client was left feeling frustrated and disappointed, as he had been expecting a simple and straightforward taxi ride, not a long and expensive journey. The client decided to take the matter into his own hands and did some research. He found out that taxi drivers sometimes take longer routes to charge more, a practice known as "long hauling." He felt like he had fallen victim to this common scam and was determined to do something about it. The client filed a complaint with the taxi company and provided evidence of the long route taken and the excessive fare charged. However, the company did not take the complaint seriously and brushed it off as an isolated incident. The client was not satisfied with the response and decided to escalate the matter. The client contacted the local consumer protection agency, who took an interest in the case. The agency conducted an investigation and found that the driver had indeed taken a long route and charged an unreasonable amount. However, the agency did not have the authority to force the taxi company to refund the overcharged fare or to discipline the driver. The client was left feeling frustrated and helpless, as it seemed like there was nothing he could do to get justice. He felt like he had fallen victim to a system that favored taxi drivers and companies, and that there was no recourse for consumers who were taken advantage of. The client learned an important lesson: sometimes, even when you take the right steps to resolve an issue, justice is not always served. There are times when the system is stacked against you, and it can be difficult to get a fair outcome. The client was left feeling disillusioned and defeated, with a sour taste in his mouth about his experience with taxis in Helsinki.